Sport Pilot Talk Forum Index Sport Pilot Talk
The discussion forum for Sport Pilots and Light Sport Aircraft
 


You are viewing the archive. Click on the "SportPilotTalk" logo on the left for the live forum!

Tailwheel/Aerobatic training in a non-LSA
Click here to go to the original topic

 
       Sport Pilot Talk Forum Index -> Hangar Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mcjon77



Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 36
Location: Chicago

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:30 pm    Post subject: Tailwheel/Aerobatic training in a non-LSA  

Does anyone know if a Sport Pilot can get their tailwheel endorsement and/or receive aerobatic training in a non-lsa.

I am not so much concerned about the tailwheel training with all of the cubs, champs, T-crafts, etc available. However, I can't find any instructors using 2 place aerobatic LSAs.

I would think that a sport pilot could get the training, since all of the flying would be dual, but I don't know.

Thanks,

Jon
Back to top  
CTflyer



Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 363
Location: eastern Connecticut

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:50 am    Post subject:  

"Does anyone know if a Sport Pilot can get their tailwheel endorsement and/or receive aerobatic training in a non-lsa. "

Jon -

Tailwheel is just an endorsement; common for sport pilots and PPL alike.

No problem getting training in a non-lsa. And no problem getting aerobatic training in a non-lsa. But remember - as a sport pilot you can't legally fly solo in a non-lsa.

Minor detail!

Tom
Back to top  
Chuckhhill



Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 45
Location: Concord, CA

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:00 pm    Post subject:  

I seem to remember there as an aerobatic ultralite biplane which you could fly after training of course, but without any license--scary stuff.
Back to top  
Chuckhhill



Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 45
Location: Concord, CA

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:40 pm    Post subject:  

You might also be interested in this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6Xj8FOUtGc&NR=1

Aerobatics in a Kitfox which would qualify for flight by a sport pilot.
Back to top  
Chuckhhill



Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 45
Location: Concord, CA

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:07 pm    Post subject:  

The aerobatic ultralight biplane I was thinking about was the Sorrell/Sunrise Aircraft Corp. SNS-8 Hyperlite

http://www.aircraftworlddirectory.com/civil/s/sorrellsns8hiperlight.htm
Back to top  
Cub flyer



Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 593

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:56 pm    Post subject:  

Watch out. Check with Skystar. A local bought one for that purpose and was told by them that the Kitfox Speedster was NOT stressed for Aerobatics.

Jim Franklin did it light and solo. And was very good. Similar to the flying farmer acts.


Two people with chutes doing aerobatics would not be good.
Back to top  
Cub flyer



Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 593

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:03 pm    Post subject:  

Is the Hyperlite aerobatic? The Hyperbipe was but never saw anything about the lite.

Also don't listen to any old timers saying a Luscombe was aerobatic. Sure it can do the maneuvers but it's not designed for it.


The only aerobatic LSA I can think of that was a certified airplane is the Reed clipped wing conversion of a J-3

http://www.airbum.com/pireps/PirepClippedCub.html
Back to top  
mcjon77



Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 36
Location: Chicago

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:31 am    Post subject:  

I am going to build a Sonex. It is stressed for aerobatics (and does a pretty good job at it, BTW). I want to get aerobatic training before doing in aerobatics in it, however. Right now, I am getting my workshop together and doing some traveling for work. I will start building in December.

Jon
Back to top  
Cub flyer



Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 593

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:56 am    Post subject:  

They look like a nice airplane.

Any time in a Citabria or Decathalon will be fine. The Sonex will probably be easier to do aerobatics in.

If you could get a little time in a RV-6 or grumman yankee you'd be really prepared. Yankee is not aerobatic but is pretty quick handling.

Of course Sonex dual would be best.
Back to top  
mcjon77



Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 36
Location: Chicago

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:54 am    Post subject:  

Cub flyer wrote:
If you could get a little time in a RV-6 or grumman yankee you'd be really prepared. Yankee is not aerobatic but is pretty quick handling...

These are two of the planes I am considering getting dual training in, not for aerobatic purposes, but for insurance reasons. After talking with an insurance broker, he recomended that if I couldn't get dual instruction in a Sonex, getting dual in a "similar" plane would work. He mentioned the Zodiac, and I mentioned an RV-6 which he thought was a good idea as well.
Back to top  
 
       Sport Pilot Talk Forum Index -> Hangar Talk
Page 1 of 1


Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB 2.0.22 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group