| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bryancobb
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 326
Location: Cartersville Georgia
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:05 am Post subject: Count SP Instruction Toward Higher Ratings? |
|
|
I have read several places, including on this forum, that dual instruction, received from a CFI Sport, cannot be used to meet any dual instruction Aeronautical Experience requirements for a Private License or higher.
I am sure this is incorrect. I am open to be proven wrong though.
If I remember correctly, the doubt was centered around the idea that a CFI Sport doesn't meet the "Authorized Instructor" sniff-test [for example 61.109(a)] to log dual for Private ratings and higher.
I believe all dual (from both "Subpart K" and "Subpart H" instructors) can be counted toward higher ratings unless the dual was in an "ultralight vehicle." |
|
| Back to top |
|
tadel001
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 251
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is a long history behind this. The bottom line...some (trying not to use a nasty word) person took it upon himself to ask for a legal opinion from FAA general counsel office. The GC said, Sport CFI does not count towards PP. AFS-610 was split on this issue but inclined to have SPI count towards PP. Unfortunately, the legal opinion eliminated that possibility.
I could write pages and pages on this but the bottom line, bad result because of a dumb question (there are dumb questions). |
|
| Back to top |
|
bryancobb
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 326
Location: Cartersville Georgia
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:39 pm Post subject: In Writing?? |
|
|
| Sorry to be a "doubting Thomas" but does anyone know of anywhere this determination is IN WRITING? |
|
| Back to top |
|
scottj
Joined: 15 Dec 2007
Posts: 87
Location: Eagan (Twin Cities) MN, USA (KLVN)
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:33 pm Post subject: dumb questions |
|
|
There is no such thing as a dumb question. Especially when it comes to flight training and FAA regulations.
I applaud the Pilot who called and asked for clarification of the rules on training from a Sport only CFI. Frankly, I teach my students to call the FAA when they have a question the FAR/AIM does not answer or cannot be answered by a local CFI.
I even call the IRS when I have a tax questions.
What kind of CFI would ever say something like that, or more so... on a public message board. Perhaps one that has not taken the time earn himself a CFI ticket and has a Sport only?
Just asking the question.... does that make me an @#$hole? |
|
| Back to top |
|
comperini
Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 144
Location: California
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:44 am Post subject: Re: In Writing?? |
|
|
bryancobb wrote: Sorry to be a "doubting Thomas" but does anyone know of anywhere this determination is IN WRITING?
here you go: http://www.121five.com/admin/FeatureArticles/FAA_SP_onesheet.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
tadel001
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 251
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scottj,
This was not a student asking the question. (However, even if it were a student, I hope instructors are not advising students to ask the general counsel's office for opinion on certain ambiguities. There is an established process through FSDOs, Sectors, Departments, etc.) In this case, AOPA, EAA and many individuals worked with AFS-610 to discuss making a change in policy. The reporter decided he would scoop the organizations and go to GC for an opinion. Anyone who paid close attention to the issue would have know that the GC would have given that opinion. We are now stuck with it until a new reg is provided.
So, while I generally agree that there are no dumb questions for students, there are dumb questions by other people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |