No. I would be the cause and not the merchant and his design and manufacture. He didn't breach anything. (He could have breached the warranty for a particular purpose-if he say his radios are waterproof. If he said "our windshields are so strong you can use steel wool on them."If you bought a used 2007 model car that you left the windows down in the rain and the radio got wet and quit. Would you expect the manufacture to replace the radio? If you cleaned the bugs off the front with steel wool should they fix the paint too?
.There are 2 things that I know of that cause the problem you have. One is not using the correct cleaning suppies. The other is leaving the airplane set outside unprotected from the elements
Warranty of merchantability-FD Loses.
why? other airplanes are left out in the elements and don't get pucked body part. So it is not the same as all the other airpllanes.
Not using the correct cleaning supplies. If FD wanted to tell me that the warranty of merchanbility was voided if I didn't use the materials they required then I could have voided that warranty. But (for sake of arguement, as I never used ANY cleaning fluid) if FD is gonna keep this a secret so as to keep up sales for example, then the Warranty of Merchantability means they pay up to make me "whole." I gave FD good money. Now they MUST give me an airplane that is as good as a Cessna or RV, etc. OR make me whole by giving the difference from what they represented the plane to be and what it really is.
BUT, other airplanes use that cleaning fluid and their wings do not pucker, THEREFORE, their airplane does not pass without objection in the trade.
You're learning a LOT today. (but your bill is now $1,200)