Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Constructive topics of interest related to aviation that do not match the other section descriptions below (as long as it is somewhat related to aviation, flying, learning to fly, sport pilot, light sport aircraft, etc.). Please, advertisements for Viagra will be promptly deleted!"

Moderator: drseti

User avatar
tu16
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:17 pm
Location: Bellevue, WA

Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by tu16 »

Hi, I've just transitioned to Sting S3 at new FBO. (My training was on Tecnam Sierra, also was renting Evektor SportStar before that).

After checkout I'm still beating the pattern trying to make a full flap landings consistent. :)
The plane's behavior in a ground effect/flare still puzzles me and I'm hoping somebody has more insights.

It feels like that - Plane is tracking a centerline nicely during short final descent (low wind - 5 kts, insignifcant crosswind component), 55kts at the threshold. While leveling out for a flare it starts yawing seemingly in random direction, any rudder input to correct also introduces noticeable pitch increase with a tendency to balloon combined with yaw oscillations. That's much more work than I was doing while landing two previous planes :) Feels like lack of aerodynamic stability (yaw/pitch) in a ground effect. Or maybe I just simply overcorrect and need to keep practicing... :) But I surely don't recall anything like that with the other two low-wing LSA I happened to fly.

While computing W&B I've noticed that CG computes closer to AFT limit (within 2inches) then to FWD limit (4+ inches). CG closer to aft limit could explain that rudder input noticeably pitches up (perhaps due to increase of dynamic air pressure on tail with rudder deflection and perhaps close to neutral pitch stability) Unusual amount of yawing is harder for me to comprehend. The CFI I flew a checkout with also mentioned that in full flaps landings the plane feels "all over the place" in a flare and that he always recommends a no-flaps/ half-flap landing in the plane at a higher speed. I guess I'm still interested in making a contact with a ground with lowest speed possible. :)

Any insights, advice? I'd appreciate if you could share your experience with that make/model full flap landing behavior -

Thanks!
Alex.
User avatar
dstclair
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:23 am
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by dstclair »

Hi Alex,

I've been flying my S3 for over 5 years and what your are experiencing is not the norm. I generally land with full flaps with winds less than 10kts or so and 1/2 flaps above that. I rarely land with zero flaps unless the wind is really howling.

My guess is that one or both of the manual trim tabs are out of whack.

When cruising straight and level at a smooth altitude, does the plane stay that way if you take your hand off the stick or does it slowly drop a wing? If so, the trim tab on the right aileron needs to be bent very slightly. If you don't drop a wing but veer direction (slight skid), then the trim tab on the tail section should be adjusted. Here are the directions: http://sting.aero/owners/howto/Trim%20T ... stment.pdf

For ballooning, I'd suggest its due to too much speed. I'd slow it down to 50kts at the threshold which is still well over 1.3Vso.

I generally pull the power abeam the numbers and let the speed bleed down 75 kts, pull one-notch of flaps, turn base with a speed around 55kts, turn final and take the last notch of flaps. This should get you to 50kts on short final with around 600fpm descent. Then touch down to the cheers of onlookers :-)
dave
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by drseti »

Alex, are you approaching in a glide, or carrying power into the flare? If the latter, you might be seeing gyroscopic precession when you raise the nose, caused by the not inconsiderable torque the Rotax 912 develops. Try gliding at idle power on final to see if that corrects the yaw tendency in the flare.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
tu16
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:17 pm
Location: Bellevue, WA

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by tu16 »

Thanks for valuable insights!

I will monitor closely my power adjustments. I do sometimes add some power (~3000) on final with full flaps to maintain intended glide slope and normally do a flare on idle. I think occasional power adjustments on short final and right before flaring may be responsible for inducing all that random yawing I have to work hard against. I'll also slow down to 50kts at the threshold to reduce a float further and potential to balloon and double check the trim in steady flight.

Huge thanks!
Hope to become a more skilled Sting S3 flier :)

Alex.
(I do miss Evektor's sliding vents - they were great for sticking camera lens for great shots w/o interference from canopy etc. :) I wish I could remove round pilot side vent from S3 canopy for the same purpose )
User avatar
dstclair
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:23 am
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by dstclair »

Alex,

Just went around the pattern a few times in light wind (at least to start with) and I actually remembered to check my airspeed when I was over the threshold. Dynon was claiming 51 kts at full flaps. Floated a little bit but no ballooning or adverse yaw that you mention. Now then I did pull the power on downwind and never touched the throttle through the landing.

Also, I'd suggest a slightly higher approach than you're using if you find you need to add power. Or hold off on the last notch of flaps until short final.

Let's us know how it works out.
dave
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by drseti »

dstclair wrote:I did pull the power on downwind and never touched the throttle through the landing.
That's exactly what I teach, Dave, and (IMHO) is the best way to land an LSA. If every landing you do is a glider landing, then an eventual engine failure becomes a non-event -- you just land it the way you always have.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
tu16
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:17 pm
Location: Bellevue, WA

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by tu16 »

drseti wrote:Alex, are you approaching in a glide, or carrying power into the flare? If the latter, you might be seeing gyroscopic precession when you raise the nose, caused by the not inconsiderable torque the Rotax 912 develops. Try gliding at idle power on final to see if that corrects the yaw tendency in the flare.
Come to think of it, Paul, the pattern of yaw-pitch coupling I've experienced is indeed consistent with gyroscopic precession... Transition with some power into a level flight would produce a gyroscopic right yaw. Counteract with left rudder and you'll get gyroscopic pitch up on that transition with resulting balloon. :) Release left rudder and pitch slightly down to bleed excessive pitch and gyroscopic effect start yawing to the left... :) Lots of work... Better glide with minimum prop rotation in flare then. Thinking back I may be in a habit of cutting to low idle right *after* rotation into a flare is completed.

What strange is that I do not recall noticeable gyroscopic effects in the two other planes. Normally they are considered negligible in tricycles because control surfaces provide enough input in all phases of flight.

I've noticed that Sting S3 does not recommend slips with full flaps citing large area of negative air pressure generated behind them affecting tail surfaces. Hence in a ground effect with full flaps the efficiency of Sting's tail group may be diminished and there's nothing much left to counteract gyroscopic forces in yaw/pitch coupling which normally would be masked by effective empennage.
Tecnam Sierra has more aerodynamic (full surface) flaps, that do not produce as much of a wake and Evektor with similar flaps has *very* low wing with tail group well above the flaps wake.

If this is correct with this in mind one also has to be very careful when practicing stalls with full flaps. If spin would develop it most likely will be unrecoverable due to aerodynamic blanketing of the tail group by turbulence from flaps. Significant percentage of Sting accidents in NTSB reports are due to spins including couple training flights with CFIs during stall practice.

Every plane has its own set of quirks. I find that every new LSA I fly teaches me to be a better pilot in its very own way... :)
NTSB Identification: ERA11LA427
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Friday, July 29, 2011 in Sarasota, FL
Aircraft: TL ULTRALIGHT SRO STING S3, registration: N2442
Injuries: 1 Fatal,1 Serious.

...

On July 29, 2011, about 1247 eastern daylight time, a special light sport airplane (SLSA) TL Ultralight Sro Sting S3, N2442, registered to N2442 Aviation, LLC, operated by Universal Flight Training, LLC, was lost from radar and crashed about 12 nautical miles southeast of the Sarasota/Bradenton International Airport (SRQ), Sarasota, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and flight plan information is unknown for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 instructional local flight from the SRQ airport. The airplane sustained substantial damage, and the certified flight instructor (CFI) sustained serious injuries while the pilot-rated student was fatally injured. The flight originated from SRQ about 1230.

According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector-in-charge, the purpose of the flight was checkout of the pilot-rated student. After departure, the flight proceeded to a practice area southeast of SRQ, and while performing a power off stall, the airplane entered a spin, which the CFI was unable to recover. The airplane impacted the canopy of a large oak tree before coming to rest at the base of the oak tree. The CFI was able to exit the airplane; however, due to his injuries, waited on the ground next to the airplane for rescue personnel. The pilot-rated student had to be extricated from the airplane. Both occupants were airlifted by helicopter to a hospital in St. Petersburg, Florida.
NTSB Identification: WPR12FA295
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Thursday, July 05, 2012 in Piru, CA
Aircraft: TL ULTRALIGHT SRO STINGSPORT, registration: N177N
Injuries: 2 Fatal.

...
On July 5, 2012, about 1324 Pacific daylight time, a TL Ultralight SRO Stingsport, N177N, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain near Piru, California. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The certified flight instructor and commercial pilot receiving instruction were fatally injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the instructional flight. The local flight originated from Whiteman Airpark, Van Nuys, California, at 1300.

Multiple witnesses driving on Highway 126 within the vicinity of the accident site reported observing the accident airplane descending in a nose low attitude while spinning in a counter-clockwise direction before it descended below a tree line....
Note that full flaps stall is required to demonstrate skill in instructional flight.
That's 2 out of 3 recorded by NTSB cases. Add the similar spin accident in Australia - this would get to 3 out of 4.... I guess I limit my practice to incipient stall in this plane ::)

One thing that bugs me somewat about LSA industry is that handling charachteristics of aircraft apprear to be not taken seriously. Evektors had long and well documented by NTSB history of loss of the control during rollout due to poor nose gear stability at higher speeds. Sting may apparently have some issues with stall/spin. These normally are inherent design flaws - fix them and probably this would end up to be a different model... I'm curious how are aerodynamic/mechanical designs wetted for overall soundness in LSA industry?
User avatar
tu16
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:17 pm
Location: Bellevue, WA

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by tu16 »

Hi, Dave - just returned from another flight. The trim seems to be ok, but yaw instability in a flare persisted even if I do not carry any power into the flare.

What I found a bit strange though is that with plane on a ground the rudder is "loose" - flapping +/- 5-7deg with no effort with wires flopping inside. It does "firm up" when large rudder input for deflection is provided. I think this can be a reason that rudder is not effective to provide a yaw stabilization (against gyroscopic effect, winds, etc.) , since rudder provides no corrective input into small yaw departures until plane acquires a yaw momentum and a firm manual rudder input has to be applied to (over)correct - causing yaw oscillations The FBO's mechanic said it's ok - something to do with springs etc. But I do not remember any "loose" rudders on other planes that did not exhibit the same loose yaw behavior. In fact preflight check of the rudder I thought was supposed to make sure among other things that is NOT loose...

How is it on your plane - is this normal? Can this be easily adjusted? Is there any material from manufacturer/norms on rudder "play" on the ground and proper adjustment?

Thanks!

Alex.
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by drseti »

There is a cable tension spec in the maintenance manual (or should be). Checking it with a tensiometer is a normal part of an annual inspection. The procedure is taught in the 3 week LSRM course.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
tu16
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:17 pm
Location: Bellevue, WA

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by tu16 »

drseti wrote:There is a cable tension spec in the maintenance manual (or should be). Checking it with a tensiometer is a normal part of an annual inspection. The procedure is taught in the 3 week LSRM course.
Found an AMM on the net: http://www.sting.aero/owners/downloads/ ... 20Ver6.pdf
Nothing about tensioning rudder cables or if a "free play" is allowable...

I feel this may be just the problem that makes this plane so "special" to land - but I need some ammunition to convince the mechanic is needs fixing....

Any Sting S3 owners with advice/help?
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by drseti »

tu16 wrote:Found an AMM on the net: <snip>
Nothing about tensioning rudder cables or if a "free play" is allowable...
Just guessing, but if there's nothing in the maintenance manual, shouldn't AC 43-13 standard practices apply? (Tom or Roger can probably answer this one.)
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
dstclair
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:23 am
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by dstclair »

tu16 wrote:Hi, Dave - just returned from another flight. The trim seems to be ok, but yaw instability in a flare persisted even if I do not carry any power into the flare.

What I found a bit strange though is that with plane on a ground the rudder is "loose" - flapping +/- 5-7deg with no effort with wires flopping inside. It does "firm up" when large rudder input for deflection is provided. I think this can be a reason that rudder is not effective to provide a yaw stabilization (against gyroscopic effect, winds, etc.) , since rudder provides no corrective input into small yaw departures until plane acquires a yaw momentum and a firm manual rudder input has to be applied to (over)correct - causing yaw oscillations The FBO's mechanic said it's ok - something to do with springs etc. But I do not remember any "loose" rudders on other planes that did not exhibit the same loose yaw behavior. In fact preflight check of the rudder I thought was supposed to make sure among other things that is NOT loose...

How is it on your plane - is this normal? Can this be easily adjusted? Is there any material from manufacturer/norms on rudder "play" on the ground and proper adjustment?

Thanks!

Alex.
The rudder on my S3 is not 'loose' at all and is one of my preflight checks.

I think you need a new mechanic :-)

PM me and I'll give you the email for the Sting mechanic at Sport Air who should be able to help you convince your mechanic.
dave
User avatar
FastEddieB
Posts: 2880
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by FastEddieB »

Not to belabor the obvious, but...

...excessively loose/slack cables can be a hazard on many different levels.

1) A loose cable can conceivably "jump" a pulley or otherwise snag or jam on something.

2) Excessive play can invite aerodynamic flutter in the control surface involved, and,

3) If you're talking rudder cables, the delay in effectiveness can lead to ground control issues up to and including pilot induced oscillations (which I think started this thought).

Probably other consequences of loose cables, but if truly loose it's not a minor issue.
Fast Eddie B.
Sky Arrow 600 E-LSA • N467SA
CFI, CFII, CFIME
[email protected]
3Dreaming
Posts: 3111
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:13 pm
Location: noble, IL USA

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by 3Dreaming »

Sometimes cable tension is provided by your feet on the pedals. It really depends on how the airplane is designed.
User avatar
FastEddieB
Posts: 2880
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA

Re: Question for an experienced Sting S3 pilot.

Post by FastEddieB »

3Dreaming wrote:Sometimes cable tension is provided by your feet on the pedals. It really depends on how the airplane is designed.
Example?

Not saying its not possible, but it sounds dubious.

People do sometimes take their feet off the rudder pedals, after all. And a flapping control surface cn be a bad thing, as I said before.
Fast Eddie B.
Sky Arrow 600 E-LSA • N467SA
CFI, CFII, CFIME
[email protected]
Post Reply