one other thing on auto mixture
With the Lycomings if you cruise under 65% power you can lean until they quit and won't do damage.
Just fly below that power setting and you can't mess it up.
I usually placard the 65% settings for each altitude on a card somewhere and fly a lot by that. Or if I'm in a hurry go higher power settings and lean till it is rough. Push mixture in till it's smooth and add 3/8 for grandma.
Keep it simple.
the old Stomberg carbs for the ancient continentals would automatically lean by the air pressure on the float bowl. No moving parts. Thats how a Cub can get to 10,000ft. Some also had a mixture knob to lean even further but they were wired off because of accidents where people expected an idle cutoff but there was none.
Light Sport Aircraft Survey
Moderator: drseti
Did the students get any results from the survey. It would be interesting how it went.
Wasn't there another manufacturer who did a similar survey a while back. wonder how it came out??
Here's another tidbit. the hottest EGT displayed on the guage might not be the hottest. Depending on probe condition, contact resistance, position in the exhaust pipe.
first to peak is what is important. coolest indicated temp could be the leanest cylinder and first to peak. You don't know. That's why the good alcor EGT guages have no temperature labels. just hash marks every 25 degrees. You just lean to peak EGT, set the needle to the star with the adjustment knob, enrichen the desired amount and watch for changes after setting the mixture. simple. no electronics needed, just a single thermocouple.
for climb just set climb power after takeoff, look over at your EGT reading and use the mixture knob to maintain that reading all the way up. then lean for cruise. If that indication was not too lean at sea level it won't be at 6000 ft Who needs automatic. I'd rather a simple knob than worrying about bellows and springs I have no control over.
The manufacturer needs to determine which is the leanest and install a single probe in that pipe. Same with CHT. determine which cylinder is hottest. Might be better than everyone watching all the bars go up and down, flashing lights, beeping. I feel like a flight engineer interpreting some of these monitors. Never had a problem without them. Keeping all those probes working is a pain and adds more weight/ expense.
Testing by the manufacturer and good baffling is the key. We're making these airplanes and flying way more complex than needed.
sorry off topic but the students tend to try to overcomplicate things.
Wasn't there another manufacturer who did a similar survey a while back. wonder how it came out??
Here's another tidbit. the hottest EGT displayed on the guage might not be the hottest. Depending on probe condition, contact resistance, position in the exhaust pipe.
first to peak is what is important. coolest indicated temp could be the leanest cylinder and first to peak. You don't know. That's why the good alcor EGT guages have no temperature labels. just hash marks every 25 degrees. You just lean to peak EGT, set the needle to the star with the adjustment knob, enrichen the desired amount and watch for changes after setting the mixture. simple. no electronics needed, just a single thermocouple.
for climb just set climb power after takeoff, look over at your EGT reading and use the mixture knob to maintain that reading all the way up. then lean for cruise. If that indication was not too lean at sea level it won't be at 6000 ft Who needs automatic. I'd rather a simple knob than worrying about bellows and springs I have no control over.
The manufacturer needs to determine which is the leanest and install a single probe in that pipe. Same with CHT. determine which cylinder is hottest. Might be better than everyone watching all the bars go up and down, flashing lights, beeping. I feel like a flight engineer interpreting some of these monitors. Never had a problem without them. Keeping all those probes working is a pain and adds more weight/ expense.
Testing by the manufacturer and good baffling is the key. We're making these airplanes and flying way more complex than needed.
sorry off topic but the students tend to try to overcomplicate things.
"Perfection is finally attained not when there is no longer anything to add but when there is no longer anything to take away." Antoine de Saint Exupery
MAP/RPM/Power
For the Rotax 912 a good estimation is:
5800 RPM and 30 inHg is 100% power, so 30*5800=174000 is full power.
5500 RPM and 23 inHg (7000 feet WOT) is about 73% power (126500.)
RPM*MP / Max.RPM*30 = % Power
This is a good rule of thumb without taking into temperature and non-linear power output of most engines etc.
For the Rotax 912 a good estimation is:
5800 RPM and 30 inHg is 100% power, so 30*5800=174000 is full power.
5500 RPM and 23 inHg (7000 feet WOT) is about 73% power (126500.)
RPM*MP / Max.RPM*30 = % Power
This is a good rule of thumb without taking into temperature and non-linear power output of most engines etc.
A quick chart showing the approximate % power (ignoring engine characteristics and temperature) using RPM vs MAP.
Code: Select all
% MAP
30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15
RPM 5800 100 97 93 90 87 83 80 77 73 70 67 63 60 57 53 50
5700 98 95 92 88 85 82 79 75 72 69 66 62 59 56 52 49
5600 97 93 90 87 84 80 77 74 71 68 64 61 58 55 51 48
5500 95 92 89 85 82 79 76 73 70 66 63 60 57 54 51 47
5400 93 90 87 84 81 78 74 71 68 65 62 59 56 53 50 47
5300 91 88 85 82 79 76 73 70 67 64 61 58 55 52 49 46
5200 90 87 84 81 78 75 72 69 66 63 60 57 54 51 48 45
5100 88 85 82 79 76 73 70 67 64 62 59 56 53 50 47 44
5000 86 83 80 78 75 72 69 66 63 60 57 55 52 49 46 43
4900 84 82 79 76 73 70 68 65 62 59 56 54 51 48 45 42
4800 83 80 77 74 72 69 66 63 61 58 55 52 50 47 44 41
4700 81 78 76 73 70 68 65 62 59 57 54 51 49 46 43 41
4600 79 77 74 71 69 66 63 61 58 56 53 50 48 45 42 40
4500 78 75 72 70 67 65 62 59 57 54 52 49 47 44 41 39
4400 76 73 71 68 66 63 61 58 56 53 51 48 46 43 40 38
4300 74 72 69 67 64 62 59 57 54 52 49 47 44 42 40 37
4200 72 70 68 65 63 60 58 56 53 51 48 46 43 41 39 36
4100 71 68 66 64 61 59 57 54 52 49 47 45 42 40 38 35
4000 69 67 64 62 60 57 55 53 51 48 46 44 41 39 37 34
3900 67 65 63 61 58 56 54 52 49 47 45 43 40 38 36 34
3800 66 63 61 59 57 55 52 50 48 46 44 41 39 37 35 33
3700 64 62 60 57 55 53 51 49 47 45 43 40 38 36 34 32
3600 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 43 41 39 37 35 33 31
3500 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30
3400 59 57 55 53 51 49 47 45 43 41 39 37 35 33 31 29
3300 57 55 53 51 49 47 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28
3200 55 53 51 50 48 46 44 42 40 39 37 35 33 31 29 28
3100 53 52 50 48 46 45 43 41 39 37 36 34 32 30 29 27
3000 52 50 48 47 45 43 41 40 38 36 34 33 31 29 28 26
Piper has charts for each RPM and altitude as to what MAP gives what power setting for constant speed airplanes.
With the ground adjustable prop on most Rotax installations there are a lot of variations.
If you only have one prop pitch then you can narrow it down a lot.
Nice chart. Follow how many different RPM's give 65% power.
Not all are smooth and not all are the best but there is a happy medium in there somewhere.
With the ground adjustable prop on most Rotax installations there are a lot of variations.
If you only have one prop pitch then you can narrow it down a lot.
Nice chart. Follow how many different RPM's give 65% power.
Not all are smooth and not all are the best but there is a happy medium in there somewhere.