Cessna Skycatcher Coming to Town
Moderator: drseti
Cessna Skycatcher Coming to Town
When I was at my local FBO today, I had a chance to speak with the owner. They currently have 2 LSA's, an Aerostar 1, and an Elitar Sigma. He said that he plans on selling them both, and replacing them with a Cessna Skycatcher. It's still about a year out, but I look forward to having the opportunity to fly one. It's certainly an attractive and comfortable looking plane.
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:15 pm
- Location: KOJC
Have you flown the Sigma at all? I've seen one once, and want to get an opportunity to fly one sometime.
In regards to the Skycatcher, it doesn't really appeal to me. Its too late to the party, with specifications that nearly every other LSA can beat. Plus, the panel is really overkill for what Cessna is building the 162 for.
In regards to the Skycatcher, it doesn't really appeal to me. Its too late to the party, with specifications that nearly every other LSA can beat. Plus, the panel is really overkill for what Cessna is building the 162 for.
KSCessnaDriver (ATP MEL, Commerical LTA-Airship/SEL, Private SES, CFI/CFII)
LSA's flown: Remos G3, Flight Design CTSW, Aeronca L-16, Jabiru J170
LSA's flown: Remos G3, Flight Design CTSW, Aeronca L-16, Jabiru J170
-
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:49 pm
I haven't tried the Sigma. My instructor seemed to shy away from it. I really like the openness of it for viewing the ground. I think at this point I'd prefer a high wing plane to train in. That's part of what drew me to the P92 I'm going to try at Lockwood.KSCessnaDriver wrote:Have you flown the Sigma at all? I've seen one once, and want to get an opportunity to fly one sometime.
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:15 pm
- Location: KOJC
I may have to stop in at Winter Heaven this fall. I saw the Sigma at Sebring this spring, and right then decided I had to get in that airplane sometime.KevinV wrote:
I haven't tried the Sigma. My instructor seemed to shy away from it. I really like the openness of it for viewing the ground. I think at this point I'd prefer a high wing plane to train in. That's part of what drew me to the P92 I'm going to try at Lockwood.
I'd agree with the CTSW. Also, a Remos G3/GX is nearly identical (cockpit wise) to the CTSW.
KSCessnaDriver (ATP MEL, Commerical LTA-Airship/SEL, Private SES, CFI/CFII)
LSA's flown: Remos G3, Flight Design CTSW, Aeronca L-16, Jabiru J170
LSA's flown: Remos G3, Flight Design CTSW, Aeronca L-16, Jabiru J170
I've flown the Sigma. It does have great visibility and handles pretty light. Once you set it up to glide in, you almost don't touch the stick again. It's kind of a non-event, which surprised me. I expected it to be very squirrley near the ground.
The plane is exactly what you think it is. It flies about 100 mph, burns about four and a half a gallons an hour and is pretty quiet with the tractor mounted engine. I like the air vents. Florida gets pretty hot but the sigma has a lot of vents and they work good.
It is set up very basically. You have fewer instruments than the Cessna which seems to want to build a 172 in an LSA. I bet they have to bulk up the generator to handle teh power demand on the 162.
The plane is exactly what you think it is. It flies about 100 mph, burns about four and a half a gallons an hour and is pretty quiet with the tractor mounted engine. I like the air vents. Florida gets pretty hot but the sigma has a lot of vents and they work good.
It is set up very basically. You have fewer instruments than the Cessna which seems to want to build a 172 in an LSA. I bet they have to bulk up the generator to handle teh power demand on the 162.