Aerotrek A220 and A240. What do you think?

Talk about airplanes! At last count, there are 39 (and growing) FAA certificated S-LSA (special light sport aircraft). These are factory-built ready to fly airplanes. If you can't afford a factory-built LSA, consider buying an E-LSA kit (experimental LSA - up to 99% complete).

Moderator: drseti

gtylerdowdy
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:54 am

Aerotrek A220 and A240. What do you think?

Postby gtylerdowdy » Mon Sep 30, 2019 5:54 pm

I'm in the market for a tailwheel LSA and keep coming back to the AeroTrek A220.

It has a Rotax 912ULS, STOL capabilities, a (self proclaimed) 115knt max cruise, a killer looking panel, and are under $95k brand new.

I've talked to Rob Rollison (AeroTrek dealer) and watched Dan Johnson's (among other) videos on the plane. I really can't find anything wrong with it.

I guess my question is: Does anyone have experience with the AeroTrek brand? Do they like it? Any downsides? I'm heading to the DeLand Aviation Show in November to see it in person. They used to be called AeroPro EuroFox until 2008 I believe (and still are in Europe).

I'm close to putting down the down-payment to get the production started. There's currently a 9 month wait time as they're being built in the Czech Republic. Maybe that's one of their downsides but anyone else's input would be appreciated!

The top LSA's I'm considering are (in this order):
AeroTrek A220
Just Highlander
Kitfox S7 (lead time is ridiculous though)
Rans S-21 OUTBOUND

Lastly, anything I buy (new or used) will already be built. I do not intend on building my own. Look forward to y'alls input!

Thank you!!

User avatar
drseti
Posts: 6379
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Aerotrek A220 and A240. What do you think?

Postby drseti » Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:05 pm

The AeroTrek 220 is essentially a Rotax-powered Avid Flyer (predecessor to the KitFox) design, produced under license in Slovakia. I've both flown and maintained them. Has flapperons just like the KitFox. Easy aircraft both to fly and to work on, though a little hard to slow down, and likes to float if you come in hot. If I were in the market for a tube and fabric taildragger, I'd find it hard to beat. But beware the tundra tires - makes them squirelly to land on pavement.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
fly@AvSport.org
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US

gtylerdowdy
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:54 am

Re: Aerotrek A220 and A240. What do you think?

Postby gtylerdowdy » Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:18 pm

drseti wrote:If I were in the market for a tube and fabric taildragger, I'd find it hard to beat. But beware the tundra tires - makes them squirelly to land on pavement.


That's good to know. It was the (tundra) option I was going to go for. I 'like' the A240s as well, and they're definitely easier to find, but man...I just love the way a tailwheel airplane looks. I guess growing up on a grass strip with 180s, 185s, SuperCubs, and a Pilatus Porter will do that to you tho, haha.

I just don't know which way to go. I weigh 200lbs and my dad, who is 6'5", weighs 240. With a useful load of 580...that doesn't leave us with much room for anything else. Any input on a LSA that can comfortably carry that load with some added gear?

I'm flying in a Just Escapade and Highlander right now with Vic Payne. 20 more MPH just sounded real nice with an AeroTrek.

User avatar
Scooper
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Santa Rosa, CA

Re: Aerotrek A220 and A240. What do you think?

Postby Scooper » Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:03 pm

One thing to bear in mind when it comes to useful load is that the Aerotrek A220's 580 pounds useful load is without fuel (empty weight is 655 with typical options and max gross is 1235. 1235 - 655 = 580). Fuel capacity is 22.5 gallons, so with full fuel (22.5 gallons x 6 pounds per gallon = 135 pounds), your full fuel payload shrinks to 445 pounds. You and your dad weigh 440 together, so your baggage would basically be limited to a shaving kit. :cry:
Stan Cooper (K4DRD)
Private Pilot ASEL LSRI
Image
Experimental AMD CH601XL-B LSA N601KE (KSTS)

gtylerdowdy
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:54 am

Re: Aerotrek A220 and A240. What do you think?

Postby gtylerdowdy » Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:18 pm

Scooper wrote:You and your dad weigh 440 together, so your baggage would basically be limited to a shaving kit. :cry:


Thanks Scoop. Guess it's time to get a whole new dad :lol: Haha.

Sincerely though, I do appreciate y'alls input. If you know of a high wing LSA that might suit us better, please let me know.

I'll continue my research. Luckily, my dad and I will be flying locally so we could get away with less fuel and no added weight. Any long distance trips would be with my wife at 140lbs, so I should be fine there.

TimTaylor
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 7:17 pm

Re: Aerotrek A220 and A240. What do you think?

Postby TimTaylor » Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:26 pm

Most people probably don't want to fly more than 6 hours in a day anyway. So, you make two fuel stops instead of one. No big deal.
Commercial Pilot Airplane Single & Multiengine Land; Instrument Airplane
Sport Endorsement Airplane Single Engine Sea
Flight Instructor Airplane Single & Multiengine
Ground Instructor Advanced Instrument
BS Engineering NC State
MBA Wisconsin

User avatar
Warmi
Posts: 915
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Frankfort, IL

Re: Aerotrek A220 and A240. What do you think?

Postby Warmi » Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:00 pm

Another possible option - Bushcat taildragger - even cheaper than Aerotrek , pretty good looking albeit a bit slower.

https://images.app.goo.gl/TYWEcVDkwTS1Cgjd8
Flying Sting S4 ( N184WA ) out of Illinois


Return to “Light Sport Aircraft”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests