Art,artp wrote:So if I want my plane fixed I have to travel 2000 miles. It seems to me Flight Design should be willing to fix my plane at the dealership I bought it from.
You keep saying you want to give people with problems a chance to be heard, but you also say you only want positive Flight Design posts on your site. How can you make a positive post about lingering problems that Flight Design can't fix? What is positive about waiting a month or more for parts? It is hard to be optimistic when a service appointment must be made 3-4 weeks in advance and if weather does not permit flight on that day then another must be scheduled 3-4 weeks after.
The fact that some guys in the western US don't have those problems doesn't do any good for someone living in the mid Atlantic region of the US.
My problem with you is that you post about your problems in a way that is very unconstructive, comes across as bashing, and you don't take the advice offered to you in response. If I were you, I would of been on the phone with Tom Peghiny along time ago to get the issue resolved. Tom responded to your issue right away, after another member of this and the CT Flyer forum brought it to his attention. Why didn't you do that, rather than just piss and moan on an internet board? It's like 'oh woe is me, over and over again. Quit crying about it, and help to solve the problems.
You said you sent Tom a registered letter, but it turns out that it was back in November, and concerning the late delivery of your plane, not your issues with service. Pick up the phone or send him an email at the correct address that is listed on the FDUSA website. No one can fix what they don't know about.
They also can't control the weather. Thus, how is it their fault that it impacts you to meet your service appointment? Did you consider local service support before you bought your plane? I certainly did. Yes, I also have to fit within their schedule, as it's a fairly busy shop. I've taken a Rotax Line Maintenance course also, and can do routine oil changes, etc. myself. If you don't want to learn about your aircraft, then you should have stuck with a plane that everybody knows how to work on. Barring that, plan ahead and fly the plane to them ahead of time, rather than take the risk of being weathered out. Arrange a ride or a rental car for the ride home and back to pick it up. It's better than waiting for another appointment. Yes, it will cost you a few bucks, but what in aviation doesn't?
What parts have you had to wait for a month to get? Parts availability hasn't been an issue for me yet, but I don't mind getting on to Sebring's and CPS's website to get parts ahead of time for routine maintenance. You can get whatever you need for the Rotax there. My distributor also works with FDUSA and Sebring to get other parts as needed, and I haven't had delays at all.
I personally would jump on Roger's offer to pay for the flight to go to the fly in. Is anybody there going to fix your plane? No, but maybe they can point you in the right direction, and provide some support. It is not a Flight Design sponsored event. Rather, Roger put's his own time and effort into organizing the fly-in, and we were lucky to have Flight Design's support last year by them sending Oliver (most technically experienced guy at the company). Tom Peghiny also came, and John and Tom Dunham from FD West were there. We had people from Dynon there showing us tricks, etc. It also was a great time. Roger outdid himself, the flying was awesome, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. It's a beautiful area to visit.
You might possibly have a good time yourself. The way your posts strike me, I want to say that we can help you pull your head out of your as*, but I, and I'm sure others, would truly like to help you solve your problems. Who knows, maybe we might even get along in real life. My right seat is open during the Fly-In, and if you show up, are cordial, and want to learn about your plane, and have some fun, you are welcome to fly with me. Weather permitting of course. You can buy me a beer as well

Roger started the CT Flyer site when myself, CharlieTango, and Roger were discussing CT's on this board, and discussed an owner's group. We wanted to learn all we could about our aircraft and share experiences with others. The site has achieved that, and I personally applaud Roger for developing it and keeping it going. It's his board, and he can make whatever rules he wants to for it. Through the CT Flyer site, I've met some great people, with whom I've shared some great experiences with, and have learned alot in the process. If you had the same attitude, you might find yourself welcome there.
To PilotJohn, whose original post kicked off this thread. Vent all you want, but again the CT Flyer site is Roger's personal property. It's not yours, thus you don't have the right to go on it and say whatever you want, without the chance of being filtered. It was created to discuss the CT ownership experiences, etc. Just because you want to compare your experience flying a CT to other LSA's, and to a 172SP, doesn't mean Roger has to like your post. He made a suggestion that this forum was more suitable, and I agree. I don't know what got you banned. Can you go to IBM or Microsoft's website, and post that you think something else is better? No, they own the site. Just because it's open to the public doesn't mean it's a forum of free speech.
I flew other LSA's and 172SP's before I bought my CT as well, and I encourage everybody considering buying a CT to do the same. I frankly don't care what your impressions or experiences are. Buy the aircraft that suits you and meets your mission. I did, and I'm quite pleased with the CT I own. My forum name on the CT Flyer site is "No Regrets". It's from how I choose to live my life, but it fits perfectly with my decision to buy a CT, and nearly a year and a half of experience with it.